TerraPass blog

SUV safety myth: children just as safe in cars

Tom Arnold

by Tom Arnold – January 4, 2006
 

(UPDATE: let the furious backpedaling begin! Apparently I skipped the marketing class in which they tell you not to refer to your customers as self-centered jerks.

This post was supposed to be about how SUVs are marketed, and the extent to which hype has become disconnected from reality. But due to some rushed editing, it appears to be an endorsement of some pretty blunt and insulting statements.

I’m sorry. The whole point of TerraPass is to give drivers — all drivers — a way to exercise their environmental stewardship. The founder of TerraPass himself drives a Ford-150. It’s a big tent. Come on in. I’ll behave.)

A new study from U-Penn’s Children Hospital shows that “children riding in SUVs have similar injury risks to children who ride in passenger cars.” Analysis from about 4,000 accidents involving children shows that the rollover risks outweigh any benefit from the larger vehicle. (A 2003 NHTSA study showed SUVs have nine-time the rollover risk.)

As many of you know from playing with our carbon calculator, the extra weight of SUVs really boosts the pollution levels that contribute to our global warming problem. 12,000 miles in a Ford Explorer will emit 13,812 lbs of CO2, 40% more than an equally snow-and-dirt-capable Subaru Outback.

Consumers often justify the purchase of SUVs with safety concerns. Sopranos fans out there will recall Tony crediting his huge Suburban with saving his life in a rollover accident, which is the reason he bought his son Anthony an XTERRA (a nice product placement for Nissan).

But the auto industry’s own marketing research suggests that car manufacturers aren’t all that interested in targeting the safety-conscious crowd. According to the new book High and Mighty: SUVs — The World’s Most Dangerous Vehicles and How They Got That Way by New York Times reporter Keith Bradsher, auto industry research paints SUV owners in an less-than-flattering light.

[SUV owners] tend to be people who are insecure and vain. They are frequently nervous about their marriages and uncomfortable about parenthood. They often lack confidence in their driving skills. Above all, they are apt to be self-centered and self-absorbed, with little interest in their neighbors and communities. No, that’s not a cynic talking – that’s the auto industry’s own market researchers and executives.

Washington Monthly’s review of the same book summarizes the research more aggressively:

Unlike any other vehicle before it, the SUV is the car of choice for the nation’s most self-centered people; and the bigger the SUV, the more of a jerk its driver is likely to be.

Here’s hoping that in addition to high gas prices, both these studies help everyday consumers (and mobsters!) change their purchase behavior to a slightly more environmentally friendly vehicle.

As a side note, you might be interested in this hilarious attempt at pro-SUV lobbying.

Tags:

Find related stories via Technorati | del.icio.us | submit to digg.com | reddit | | SUV safety myth: children just as safe in cars

Further reading

Comments

1. Comment by John Hritz @ Jan 11, 2006 10 AM Comment permalink

It would seem to me that deriding potential customers of TerraPass is counter-productive. I can’t think of any group of people that I’d like to see pay for carbon offsets than SUV owners.

2. Comment by Adam @ Jan 11, 2006 10 AM Comment permalink

Agreed. If we could we would take this post back, but it seems better to let it stand, admit the mistake, and draw the appropriate lessons.

In a company as small as ours, there is very little communications buffer between employees and customers. This is both a good and a bad thing, but in this case common sense took a Christmas holiday. We’re sorry.

We really do appreciate every single one of our customers, including the SUV drivers. Thanks for the feedback, and keep it coming.

3. Comment by John @ Jan 18, 2006 10 AM Comment permalink

I don’t see that you maligned your customers; the NY Times and Washington Monthly maligned your customers (some of them).

4. Comment by Anonymous @ Feb 9, 2007 4 PM Comment permalink

As a LandRover Discovery driver I’d just like to share with the rest of you that we’re not all selfish egomaniacs… Upon learning more about global warming I thought about dumping this monster on the 2nd hand market and getting a hybrid to be more green… but then I realized that the LandRover would likely become a commuter car for someone else while the hybrid sat barely used in my driveway. That’s stupid. It will do less damage with me as the owner since I barely drive anywhere. So I bought enough carbon offsets to cover my entire family’s footprint instead. We’re not all bad folks. Many of us will not make the same mistake the next time we buy a vehicle. Unfortunately most people cannot afford to retire (not resell) a gas hungry vehicle.

Post a comment

Search the TerraPass blog

Subscribe by RSS

  • Subscribe to the TerraPass RSS feed
  • Subscribe in My Yahoo
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Bloglines
  • Add to Google

Turn your old cellphones and PDAs into a FREE TerraPass.