The #Tesla #Powerwall being installed in #VT by @GreenMtnPower. Learn about #EnergyStorage https://t.co/CrjuVLe7AP
Cap and trade (and energy policy, too)
For environmental policy wonks, few pieces of legislation have been as widely anticipated as what Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) released today in his draft American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (summary here). Waxman became chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this year — taking over from Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) — and vowed to push a climate bill through committee by Memorial Day and the full House by year-end. That would be a tall order under any circumstances; its made even more difficult with the country in the depths of an economic recession.
Waxman and his subcommittee chair, Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA), came out swinging for the fences today with a mega-bill that addresses energy policy (federal renewable energy standards, new energy efficiency standards, support for plug-in hybrids and smart grid technologies) as well as climate change (carbon caps on 85% of the U.S. economy, greenhouse gas regulation for cars, low-carbon fuel standard, and investments in carbon sequestration). In a word, this legislative draft is breathtaking. But can it pass?
Waxmans strategy must be to offer enough program features so that everyone (or at least a majority in Congress) likes enough of the components to vote for the whole thing. I can see this approach working, and I can also see it leading to Congressional paralysis. Just understanding the bills implications may require each member of Congress to take a tutorial in energy and climate policy economics.
The legislative drafters have shrewdly inserted measures (particularly a system of rebates) to cushion the economic impact on the most affected industries. In addition, carbon offsets would play a major role in meeting the proposed GHG caps, thus reducing compliance costs.
Last month, Energy & Environment Daily tried to assess where House members currently line up on climate legislation. 218 votes are needed for a majority. Here’s their take:
* Yes: 163
* Fence Sitters: 126
* No: 146
Lots of horse-trading will surely occur before the full House votes on Waxman’s bill in late 2009. And then there’s the Senate, which must work in parallel to come up with its own bill. Watch for a legislative battle commensurate with what’s at stake!