|
|
Tough guv says: keep Cali cool
Schwarzenegger pushes forward with plan for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.Regulating greenhouse gases is good for the economy. That was the message California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger gave to Republican legislators, who pressed him last week to delay implementing the state’s landmark Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32). The governor said cutting jobs at the California Air Resources Board (CARB) — the agency charged with enforcing the law — would be a short-sighted way to save money in the state budget. “AB 32 is stimulating the economy by creating new opportunities,” said Lisa Page, a spokeswoman for the governor. Schwarzenegger’s firm stance is a sign that he wants to leave a strong environmental legacy when he concludes his second term in 2011. He could have scored some points with his party and with powerful segments of the California business community by agreeing to delay the greenhouse gas rules. But instead the governor stayed on the green path. Meanwhile, CARB is methodically moving forward with the scoping plan for AB 32, a draft of which is due in late June and a final version by the end of this year. More specific rules are to be developed in 2009. The first provisions of the law will start to bite in 2010. After listening to a public hearing on AB 32 in Sacramento last Friday, I continue to be impressed with the thorough state process and the smart agency staff involved. These civil servants are blazing new trails on how to cost-effectively reduce carbon emissions. When the rules are announced, no significant constituencies will be able to claim that they weren’t consulted. New leadership in the state legislature will be key to sustaining support for the law. Here are some encouraging developments:
All good to see in a state that took a chance on a “green” (read: inexperienced) actor/politician who now may be the “greenest” (read: enviro) governor in the land. Tags: AB 32, California, Greenhouse gas emissions, SchwarzennegerFurther reading
Like this article? Get weekly updates by email!
CommentsWell not really. Cars burn fossil fuel (sequestered ages ago from the atmosphere) thus adding to the overall carbon dioxide buildup in the current atmosphere. A fire burns wood which does not add to the overall CO2 buildup because the tree actually pulled CO2 from the atmosphere to grow. Basically all that wood is made of air, sunlight and trace minerals. Mostly carbon converted to sugar and starch. That RINO is leaving a strong environmental legacy alright. Firing anyone who opposes his big oil lobbyist buddies objectives. I’d like to shove his hydrogen highway where the sun don’t shine! Post a comment |











I would like to comment on the ads for california state tourist asso. the part about keep the night fires burning with a family sitting around a outdoor fire. 1 fire burning for 1 hr equals 89 cars running for 1 hr in terms of pollution produced. not to mention the harmfull chemicals such as dioxin, and the health effects from breathing particulate matter.the govener needs to be aware of the harm caused by burning.