Climate change books coming thick and fast
The New York Times has made available the first chapter of Elizabeth Kolbert’s new book on global warming, Field Notes from a Catastrophe. Haven’t read the book, so I can’t make a recommendation, but it’s title suggests that it could be the feel-good crossover hit that finally breaks global warming into the mainstream discourse. The Times has reviewed the book twice recently, once in the Arts section, and again in the Sunday book section, alongside a review of Tim Flannery’s The Weather Makers: How Man Is Changing the Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth, whose first chapter is also available online. Both books receive high marks for breaking down maddeningly complex scientific and political questions into digestible prose. One of the few quibbles the reviewer of The Weather Makers has is with the author’s use of the term “Gaia-cide” — as in Mother Nature slaughter — to describe our present environmental course. …this is not a useful way to think about global warming; it makes no sense to separate ourselves from nature this way. Long before Henry Ford fired up his first Model T, the climate changed drastically many times, and living things often played a major role in those changes. Reading the first chapter of Kolbert’s book suggests another reason why Gaia-cide is an inappropriate term. After all, it isn’t really possible to kill the Earth. We can merely make it uninhabitable by humans. Comments2 comment(s) on this post. Leave your own!
Post a comment |



I just heard Flannery on "Fresh Air", and he made an incredibly innumerate comment; he said the 2C rise in global temperature is a more than 10% rise in temperature, since the global average is only 13.5C.
That is idiotic and suggests he is no scientist. In order to calculate % increase in temperature you need to use a scale that starts at absolute zero, such as Kelvin, not a scale with an arbitrary zero like Celsius or Fahrenheit. It made me skeptical of his expertise.
Reply
he could have easily done a temperature conversion. any highschool student could have, it doesnt take a very bright person to figure that one out.
you would simply do the math in kelvin fr the purpose of measurements and then convert it into celsius so that it is easier for the public to understand.
most people do not think in terms of kelvin as most people are not scientists that work with this stuff every day. if your going to put things out for the general public then it needs to be something more easily understood.
Reply