|
|
TerraPass project spotlight: the Haubenschild dairy farm
Below is a lengthy excerpt of the WSJ article, but first two points of clarification on issues that might otherwise be confusing:
OK, hopefully that’s clear. Here’s a portion of the article: Dennis Haubenschild, a longtime environmentally conscious farmer, wants his business to be carbon neutral or sustainable. However, he found it difficult to gain investors’ interest in purchasing his farm’s carbon credits, especially because it is too small to sell them on the Chicago Climate Exchange, or CCX. Companies and municipalities join the CCX and voluntarily agree to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Members who reduce emissions by more than 1% each year can sell surplus carbon credits on the exchange, or bank them. Tags: Carbon offsets, Dairy farming, Haubenschild, Methane digesterFurther reading
Like this article? Get weekly updates by email!
↓ Advertisement. Article continues below. ↓
 
Comments
OK, good. I wasn’t really trying to apologize for anything, but I’m glad the article was clear. I do have some experience with this sort of thing, though, and it is easy for people to take slightly vague statements in weird directions. So how long HAS the methane digester been in operation? How can purchasers of those offsets be guaranteed that Dennis wouldn’t really have installed the digester anyways, whether now or in a few years? It sounds like he was pretty much on the track to do so!
The digester was installed in 1999. You can read all about it here: http://www.mnproject.org/e-haubenschildfarm.html The recent date of construction is one additionality test. A second one is that the finances of the digester don’t allow it to pay for its own operation. Without offsets, Dennis would be running it at a loss, which is not something working farms can generally afford to do. Can you tell me how the carbon credits are calculated for such a farm? Are these renewable energy credits from producing his electricity? Does TerraPass calculate it or the Chicago Climate Exchange? Thanks.
The carbon offsets from the farm come from the destruction of methane, not from the electricity generation, although this is a great side benefit. TerraPass doesn’t perform any of the calculations. I believe they are performed by environmental consultants and then registered with the CCX. Tom will chime in if I’ve misspoken. Very interesting. How often is the price paid for the carbon credits adjusted? I note, for example, that today’s price on CCX is about $1.70-$1.75 per metric ton. Also, does the farm get credits both for the estimated methane that might have escaped to the atmosphere from the storage lagoon (and is now being diverted), or only for the quantity of methane burned to generate power? (I wonder, for example, if a solids recovery system was installed before the lagoon — which would also reduce methane emissions from the lagoon — would the farm also be eligible?) Thanks, John PS - It’s a wonderful service that you provide, working with farmers who are too small to directly work with CCX.
Hi John, I believe the price on CCX changes daily, but we aren’t trading anywhere near that actively. Because of the overhead of all the verification we do, we tend to buy in large blocks a handful of times each year. Carbon credits are generated from actual methane burned, not from estimates. The methane capture system is metered, so the readings are quite accurate. - Adam Post a comment |


The Wall Street Journal ran a nice 









I read the WSJ article and didn’t pick up on your concerns. Perhaps I’m not a discerning enough reader, but the sentences in question seemed quite simple and straightforward. I know you’ve felt in the past that you’ve been misinerpreted, or that what you’re doing has been misunderstood, but in this case I don’t think you need to worry. If I were a farmer and reading the WSJ, I’d find out about the whole thing, including your part in it. And if I were you, I’d stop apologizing before the fact.