Prospects brighten for climate bill in SenateKerry and Graham collaboration could lead to 60 votes
Optimism is growing in Washington that the U.S. Senate could pass comprehensive climate and energy legislation by early next year. A series of developments, including a recent New York Times op-ed by Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), show a path to the 60 votes needed in the Senate to overcome a likely filibuster. In a piece titled “Yes We Can (Pass Climate Change Legislation)” Sens. Kerry and Graham wrote that even political opponents could find common ground in an effort to set a national cap on greenhouse gas emissions. They outlined a framework for reaching consensus in the Senate:
Kerry and Graham summarized:
Graham’s participation signals that perhaps as many as five other Republicans — Lugar (IN), McCain (AZ), Snowe (ME), Collins (ME), and Murkowski (AK) — may support climate legislation and counteract expected “no” votes from 5 to 6 Senate Democrats. In addition to the Kerry-Graham op-ed, defections of companies such as PG&E, Exelon, and Apple from the Chamber of Commerce over its head-in-the-sand climate position has revealed to senators that a substantial number of businesses want to see climate legislation passed. EPA’s move to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act is also having an effect on the outlook in Washington. Congress would rather have a central role in writing the climate and energy rules than have the job done by a federal agency on its own. On Oct. 27, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) will begin hearings on the climate bill (S. 1399) she has co-authored with Sen. Kerry. This bill matches up in many ways with the Waxman-Markey legislation, which the House of Representatives passed in June. There’s still a long road ahead to negotiate the details of a bill that could pass the full Senate. Groups like the Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, and American Farm Bureau will be spending tens of millions in advertising dollars to maintain the status quo. However, compared to the gloomy outlook of recent months, the new optimism about climate legislation represents a remarkable turnabout. Comments
Post a comment |


I am opposed to proposed legislation that attempts to impose tariffs on foreign goods that "do not meet U.S. environmental standards". There is too much protection of special interest groups with such language.
Reply