Florida buys U.S. Sugar, returns land to EvergladesDeal compared to creation of America’s first national park.
This has not much to do with climate change, but it’s too interesting not to mention:
Florida is paying $1.75 billion for about 300 square miles of land north of the park, area critical to restoring the natural flow of water that feeds the so-called “river of grass.” There are still some messy details to be worked out — the land isn’t contiguous, so swaps might be necessary; prices could change; etc. But conservationists are positively giddy over the deal, comparing its significance to the establishment of Yellowstone, America’s first national park. The Wall Street Journal has some interesting back story on the deal, including speculation that Florida governor Charlie Crist is attempting to burnish his national stature and environmental cred in a bid to remain in the running as McCain’s VP pick. Also worth noting is the deal is a bit of a two-fer: a huge win for the environment, and also a bail-out for a politically connected and financially troubled sugar company. Regardless of how it came about, though, it seems like a very good day for a unique and threatened ecosystem. Image by The New York Times Company. Comments
The comments section is now closed. |


WHY are we allowing sugar cane production to be shut down in Florida? Brazil has weaned themselves off of oil dependency through biofuel developed from sugar cane; it is far superior to corn for biofuel. Biofuel is sustainable and is one of the multipronged efforts that we should fully develop in order to get our energy costs under control.
This smells of a big oil play to push for off-shore drilling under the guise of being environmentally friendly.
signed
A conservative patriot and good steward of our environment
Reply
Er...who's allowing what? U.S. Sugar is a private company that sold itself at a significant premium to a willing buyer. If there's money to be made in sugar, other farms will step up and produce sugar, on less environmentally sensitive land.
Of course, in general we'd be better off buying our sugar from lower-cost producers...such as Brazil.
Reply
Coastal homeowners and the coal industry take note. US Sugar probably decided that this was a good time to get out because sea level rise would likely have forced them out of business anyway within a few decades. Now we must halt global warming, so that this and many other expensive investments will not have been in vain.
Reply
I think of this as an early example of "The Great Retreat" - humanity cleaning up our messes and returning the land we have "borrowed", back to mother nature. I hope we have the wisdom to keep gracefully retreating like this by returning overdeveloped land back to its original state.
A century from now, if we end up maintaining only half or a quarter of our current footprint, we would have proven ourselves wise and worthy stewards of the planet!
Reply
Firstly, I consider myself a good steward of our environment as well, which is why I wholly support this purchase - it only saddens me that there was not enough public interest to save the Babcock Ranch (and countless other sensitive habitats) from developers. And there are still plenty of sugar companies in Florida!
Secondly, I don't think buying our goods from overseas is such a good idea, do you? Florida sugar has a bad rep, but it is worth noting that companies like Florida Crystals have done a great deal for sustainability; for instance, they regularly rotate crops, grow organic and have created a renewable energy power plant that extracts energy from the cane stalk. Furthermore, Florida Crystals is working to convert more than 100,000 acres of farmland to filter marshes as part of their participation in the Everglades Forever Act.
Still want to buy Brazilian? I don't mean to sound like a paid lobbyist - I am merely a concerned consumer and long time Florida resident. To that end, I welcome more information and other aspects of this story, as there are likely a great many factors. For instance, one of my coworkers pointed out that the timing of this deal appears to suspiciously coincide with the layoff of thousands of teachers statewide.
Lastly, I am a bit leery of extracting biofuel from food sources - I wonder if there was a way to extract our energy from the exotic invasive plants that do their part to wreak havoc on the hydrology of FL? Imagine it, dumping Brazilian Pepper or Melaleuca in your tank! What an idyllic paradise!
Reply
Bravo, t4mk4t. I personally buy organic sugar grown in Florida. I personally believe that we must protect the Everglades and all rivers and streams. And I personally believe that it can be done and we can as individuals make choices that state that we DEMAND products that do not create issues in our own "nest". Whatever the factors regarding the return of the property in the Everglades if it is kept in the forefront of our conversations and minds and if we all make conscience choices when it is "necessary" to purchase something change will come.
Reply