TerraPass blog

Crunching some numbers on Paris bike-sharing program

Adam Stein

Bike-sharing offers modest emissions reductions, and no reason to complain.

by Adam Stein – July 15, 2008
 
velib2.jpg

On the first anniversary of Vélib, the Times dishes up some stats on Paris’ popular bike-sharing program:

  • Riders took 27.5 million trips in the first year.
  • The current pace is about 120,000 trips per day.
  • The program includes 20,600 bikes.
  • The 1,450 self-service rental stations are available every 300 yards.
  • The bikes are heavy and expensive — $3,460 and 50 lbs — built to withstand theft, mistreatment, and heavy riding.
  • Nevertheless, 3,000 bikes have gone missing, about 15% of the total.

Such programs, done right, do a fantastic job of boosting bicycle ridership. One thing they don’t necessarily do, however, is reduce a lot of carbon emissions. I built a simple model using the cited figures, and added in assumptions about average trip length, the number of displaced car miles, average fuel efficiency, etc. The results are necessarily rough, but I estimate the program is currently reducing maybe 40,000 metric tons of CO2 per year, about the amount saved by removing 5,700 cars from the road. (This suggests that it takes about 3.6 shared bicycles to replace a car.)

40,000 tons ain’t bad, and with more generous assumptions and future growth factored in the number might double or even triple. But even that would be a modest figure in the context of the price tag — $142 million to set up the program, and millions in maintenance costs per year. The cost per ton of CO2 pencils out in the many hundreds of dollars, a price that makes solar photovoltaics look like an incredible bargain.

Which is not to say that bike-sharing programs are a bad idea. On the contrary, the costs of the Vélib program are being entirely borne by a private company in exchange for advertising rights, a deal that is proving handsomely profitable for everyone involved - company, city, and citizens. But it does suggest that bike-sharing shouldn’t be oversold as a solution to climate change, but instead should be seen as part of the movement toward green, livable cities that prioritize citizens over cars.

In the meantime, New York gazes across the pond at Paris and likes what it sees. The city just put out a “Request For Expressions of Interest” to determine what a similar program over here might look like. Compact, flat, and bustling, New York is ripe for bicycles.

Image by Ed Alcock for The New York Times.

Tags: ,

Find related stories via Technorati | del.icio.us | submit to digg.com | reddit | | Crunching some numbers on Paris bike-sharing program

Further reading

Comments

1. Comment by Rich Roth @ Jul 16, 2008 5 AM Comment permalink

The Paris system is just the latest install of a system that is has been running for number of years in Sevilla and Barcelona as well as other cites in Eurpoe. Also, I have no evidence of ‘advertising’ on the systems I’ve seen.

2. Comment by Greg @ Jul 16, 2008 9 AM Comment permalink

Not to mention the non-carbon benefits which are also small individually. Fewer car accidents, less congestion, better health, etc.

3. Comment by David B @ Jul 16, 2008 10 AM Comment permalink

I think this is a cool idea and wouldn’t mind seeing it rolled out in other cities (particularly because it doesn’t use public funds). There’s also the cultural or viral impact it could have (but is very difficult to measure). Maybe people who ride the bikes then decide to buy their own and use it instead of their cars. Or it may encourage other bike owners to ride instead of drive. City planning would be forced to consider bicycle traffic and safety in future projects, further encouraging bicycle transportation. I think this program could spur a great sociocultural shift!

4. Comment by Adam Stein @ Jul 16, 2008 10 AM Comment permalink

Rich — the advertising component is the right to erect billboards in the city.

Greg and David — yes, lots of follow-on benefits. Generally, the more bikers that are on the road, the safer biking becomes, probably in part because of specialized infrastructure that caters to bikers (such as separated lanes) and in part because drivers are conditioned to expect them. And of course less car use means less congestion, better local air quality, etc.

5. Comment by Jonno @ Jul 16, 2008 7 PM Comment permalink

The money saved from reduced health costs will be significant, as well as improving quality of life.

6. Comment by Bill B @ Jul 21, 2008 6 PM Comment permalink

Let’s not forget the fine work that Paul DeMaio is doing right here in DC with MetroBike. Some power-hookup delays have pushed the launch into August, but sheesh, it’s right around the corner! For once, DC is on the edge ahead of New York and San Francisco …

And while I’m no fan of billboards, I am a fan of public/private partnerships where win-win-win (corporation, local government, and the public) is the name of the game. I really look forward to putting the MetroBikes through their paces.

7. Comment by Adam Stein @ Jul 21, 2008 7 PM Comment permalink

Haven’t forgotten! Greatly looking forward to seeing how the DC system works out. I admit to being concerned that the system doesn’t have quite the density necessary to really take off, but hopefully people will use it and it will grow over time.

Post a comment

Search the TerraPass blog

Subscribe by RSS

  • Subscribe to the TerraPass RSS feed
  • Subscribe in My Yahoo
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Bloglines
  • Add to Google

Turn your old cellphones and PDAs into a FREE TerraPass.